<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Diversity on guy@secdev.uk</title>
    <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/diversity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Diversity on guy@secdev.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <copyright>Guy Dixon | guy@secdev.uk</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/diversity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Building Diverse Teams That Actually Work</title>
      <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/1.9-building-diverse-teams-that-actually-work/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/1.9-building-diverse-teams-that-actually-work/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of those topics where I&amp;rsquo;ve watched the conversation evolve significantly over the course of my career. Twenty-five years ago, &amp;ldquo;diversity&amp;rdquo; in tech largely meant making sure the team photo didn&amp;rsquo;t look &lt;em&gt;entirely&lt;/em&gt; homogeneous. The bar was low, and most of us, myself included, didn&amp;rsquo;t think critically enough about what we were missing. The more I&amp;rsquo;ve researched this topic and reflected on my own experience leading teams of different shapes and sizes, the more I&amp;rsquo;ve come to believe that diversity isn&amp;rsquo;t just the right thing to do. It&amp;rsquo;s the thing that makes teams actually work better. But only if you pair it with genuine inclusion. Without that, it&amp;rsquo;s just optics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
