<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Genai on guy@secdev.uk</title>
    <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/genai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Genai on guy@secdev.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <copyright>Guy Dixon | guy@secdev.uk</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/genai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The AI Literacy Gap: Why Your Leadership Team Needs to Catch Up</title>
      <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/4.1-the-ai-literacy-gap/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/4.1-the-ai-literacy-gap/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With the emergance of AI/GenAI, I felt that I needed to think, and write, about the impact of AI/GenAI on technology leadership. The next series of articles will be exporing this topic. As an emerging topic, these articles may well be shorter, and I will try and publish them weekly when possible.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Most engineering leadership teams I talk to have a wide spread of AI understanding. On one end, you&amp;rsquo;ve got the enthusiasts, they&amp;rsquo;ve built agents, they use AI coding assistants daily, they can explain transformer architectures over a pint. On the other end, you&amp;rsquo;ve got leaders who haven&amp;rsquo;t meaningfully engaged with any of it. They&amp;rsquo;ve read the headlines, they&amp;rsquo;ve sat through a vendor demo, and they&amp;rsquo;re quietly hoping this is a hype cycle that will pass.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
