<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Psychological-Safety on guy@secdev.uk</title>
    <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/psychological-safety/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Psychological-Safety on guy@secdev.uk</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <copyright>Guy Dixon | guy@secdev.uk</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.secdev.uk/blog/tags/psychological-safety/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Psychological Safety Is the Foundation Everything Else Sits On</title>
      <link>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/1.1-why-psychological-safety-is-the-foundation-everything-else-sits-on/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.secdev.uk/blog/leadership/1.1-why-psychological-safety-is-the-foundation-everything-else-sits-on/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You can have the best engineers, the clearest roadmap, and the most elegant architecture in the world, and none of it will matter if your team doesn&amp;rsquo;t feel safe enough to speak up when something&amp;rsquo;s wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been leading engineering teams for over two decades now, across start-ups and large corporates, and if there&amp;rsquo;s one thing I keep coming back to, it&amp;rsquo;s this: the teams that performed best weren&amp;rsquo;t the ones with the most talent. They were the ones where people felt safe enough to be honest. Safe enough to say &amp;ldquo;I don&amp;rsquo;t understand this,&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;I think we&amp;rsquo;re making a mistake,&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;I need help.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
